today lottery result
2025-01-09   

Starmer says ‘bulging benefits bill’ is ‘blighting our society’today lottery result 。

Recent events globally have unfolded at a breathtaking speed. After nearly 14 years of conflict in Syria, it is remarkable that within a single week, the opposition managed to dismantle a long-lasting dictatorship and restore peace and stability in the majority of the country. This week, regime change in Syria dominated the global agenda, marking a pivotal moment in the Middle East geopolitics. The opposition achieved legitimacy and drastically shifted the balance of power, making the previous rulers and their allies increasingly illegitimate. A decade ago, during the Geneva peace process, Russia, Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad were regarded as the legitimate representatives of Syria. However, their treatment of the Syrian people, marked by actions akin to those of occupiers, has eroded their standing. Today, the Assad regime, along with Russia and Iran, has shifted from a position of legitimacy to one of profound illegitimacy. The Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and the Syrian National Army (SNA), once regarded with suspicion, have unexpectedly emerged as the most legitimate actors in the region. In contrast, Türkiye, despite its active role, appears to be positioned as a more peripheral element in the evolving regional dynamics. Legitimacy is a valuable quality for the future of societies and states. I think all nations of the world should learn lessons from the behavior of Iran, Russia and the Assad regime in Syria. In fact, Russia initially played a more rational role in Syria. However, the involvement of Iran in radicalizing Shiite militias and Hezbollah, pushing them into a position of anger and violence reminiscent of Daesh, effectively poisoned the stance of Russia within the climate shaped by the Assad regime. The actions of Iran have arguably pushed Russia into a position where it perceives all Sunnis as terrorists and views a broad swath of the population as adversaries. Russia will likely reconsider its alliance with Iran and be more cautious in its affinity next time. On the other hand, Trump, believing that it is useless to invest trillions of dollars in the Middle East without any tangible returns, as seen in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, declared that "the Syrian issue belongs to the Syrians" and that the United States would not intervene further. He emphasized his intention to shift focus toward securing peace in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia. The Damascus regime has collapsed and lost its legitimacy, while the PKK terrorist organization and its Syrian wing YPG have increasingly come to resemble the Assad regime in their actions and approach. As a result, they will also gradually lose their foothold over time. Israel's occupation and immoral policies, along with its disregard for international law, have compounded its aggression toward Syria, particularly at a time when the Syrian people were uniting to secure their future, change the regime and build a new state. In fact, the issue of illegitimacy, previously applicable to Russia, Iran and the Assad regime, will soon extend to Israel as well. Just as Assad oppressed his own people, with Iran supporting him through terrorist organizations, leading to their loss of legitimacy, Israel, as a state, has over the past year adopted policies that impudently violate international law, the laws of war, fundamental human rights, including to access essential food. In doing so, Israel has fallen into an illegitimate position both in the West Bank and Gaza. As if all this illegality and aggression were not enough, Israel directly violated Syria's borders and launched attacks while the Syrian state was in the process of formation. A country's defense industry plays a crucial role in shaping its future, yet Israel launched unlawful attacks on the defense industry and technology of Syria, aiming to cripple its economy. Every nation faces difficult times, and in such moments, some countries offer support, helping others through challenges. In contrast, some nations betray and occupy, exploiting vulnerable periods of transition for their own gain. It remains unclear, for now, which countries will align with the new Syrian government and which will oppose it. However, the new government and the Syrian people are unlikely to hold any significant sympathy for Iran, particularly in light of the actions that it conducted in Syria. Meanwhile, Israel's behavior has been deeply concerning. Besides consistently disregarding international law in Gaza and ignoring United Nations resolutions, Netanyahu has manipulated Biden and the U.S., playing them like a cat does with a mouse. Every time the U.S. takes steps toward peace, Netanyahu escalates the situation – whether by bombing hospitals, attacking places of worship or initiating military invasions. This war will eventually come to an end, and a state will be established in Syria. Just as Israel has made enemies of nations worldwide, its invasion of Syria has made 30 million Syrians its enemies for eternity. While Syria may not be the wealthiest state in the Arab world, it stands out for its profound historical legacy. Aleppo has a 5,000-year history, and Damascus, with its 10,000 years, was also the capital of the Umayyad Caliphate, one of the most significant states in history. Syria is the cultural and historical homeland of all Arabs, and Syrians have been pioneers in education and intellectualism across the Arab world. By attempting to occupy Syria, Israel is effectively declaring to the world, "Muslims and Arabs should hate and oppose us until the end of time." It is hard to imagine a more significant self-destructive impact on a nation's future and on the Jewish people than the course of actions taken by Israel in this conflict.

Lara Trump stepping down as RNC co-chair and addressing speculation about Florida Senate seat"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum." Section 1.10.32 of "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum", written by Cicero in 45 BC "Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?" 1914 translation by H. Rackham "But I must explain to you how all this mistaken idea of denouncing pleasure and praising pain was born and I will give you a complete account of the system, and expound the actual teachings of the great explorer of the truth, the master-builder of human happiness. No one rejects, dislikes, or avoids pleasure itself, because it is pleasure, but because those who do not know how to pursue pleasure rationally encounter consequences that are extremely painful. Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain pain of itself, because it is pain, but because occasionally circumstances occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?" 1914 translation by H. Rackham "But I must explain to you how all this mistaken idea of denouncing pleasure and praising pain was born and I will give you a complete account of the system, and expound the actual teachings of the great explorer of the truth, the master-builder of human happiness. No one rejects, dislikes, or avoids pleasure itself, because it is pleasure, but because those who do not know how to pursue pleasure rationally encounter consequences that are extremely painful. Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain pain of itself, because it is pain, but because occasionally circumstances occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?" Thanks for your interest in Kalkine Media's content! To continue reading, please log in to your account or create your free account with us.

Putin says Russia-China mutual investment policies effective

Cabinet ministers have been warned they must find more savings in their departments as the Chancellor said “every pound” of Government spending will be scrutinised in a major budget review. Secretaries of State are being told that any outgoings which are not contributing towards one of Labour’s “priorities” must be cut as Rachel Reeves vows to wield “an iron fist against waste.” In letters sent by Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones, departments will be told to brace for “difficult” spending decisions in order to restore trust in the Government’s handling of the public finances. Every pound of departmental spending will be face a “line-by-line review” involving external finance experts from banks and think tanks in order to ensure it represents good value for money, the Treasury said. The Chancellor will on Tuesday launch the next round of Government spending, and is expected to warn departments that they “cannot operate in a business-as-usual way when reviewing their budgets for the coming years”. She will insist that areas focused on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s “plan for change”, which includes targets to improve living standards across the country and build 1.5 million homes, must be prioritised. Ms Reeves said: “By totally rewiring how the Government spends money we will be able to deliver our plan for change and focus on what matters for working people. “The previous government allowed millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money to go to waste on poor value for money projects. We will not tolerate it; I said I would have an iron grip on the public finances and that means taking an iron fist against waste. “By reforming our public services, we will ensure they are up to scratch for modern day demands, saving money and delivering better services for people across the country. That’s why we will inspect every pound of Government spend, so that it goes to the right places and we put an end to all waste.” Under the Treasury’s plans, departments will ensure budgets are scrutinised by “challenge panels” of external experts including former senior management of Lloyd’s Banking Group, Barclays Bank and the Co-operative Group. These panels, which will also involve think tanks, academics and the private sector, will advise on which spending “is or isn’t necessary”, the ministry said. The Treasury said work has already begun, with an evaluation of the £6.5 million spent on a scheme that placed social workers in schools finding “no evidence of positive impact on social care outcomes”. “Departments will be advised that where spending is not contributing to a priority, it should be stopped,” it said. “Although some of these decisions will be difficult, the Chancellor is clear that the public must have trust in the Government that it is rooting out waste and that their taxes are being spent on their priorities.” Ms Reeves had already announced efficiency and productivity savings of 2% across departments in her autumn Budget as she seeks to put the public finances on a firmer footing. In a speech in east London, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden hinted at a further squeeze. “At the Budget the Chancellor demanded efficiency and productivity savings of 2% across departments – and there will be more to come,” he said. “As we launch the next phase of the spending review at its heart must be reform of the state in order to do a better job for the public.” The Liberal Democrats accused the Government of “missing opportunities and making self-defeating decisions” in the Budget, and urged it not to “make the same mistakes” in the spending review. The party’s Treasury spokeswoman, Daisy Cooper, said: “Leaving the social care sector in crisis is a false economy that will only put people at risk and damage the public finances. “The Government cannot afford to make the same mistakes in the spending review as they did with the Budget, missing opportunities and making self-defeating decisions. “The Government must use this Review to invest to save, taking into account the billions of pounds that could be saved in the NHS budget by investing.”Supermodel Heidi Klum has blocked comments on a post revealing her latest lingerie ad with her daughter Leni after fans began calling it "inappropriate" and "weird." This isn't the first time the America's Got Talent judge has been slammed for flaunting her barely covered figure and neither is it for Leni, who has shared pictures on social media . Over the past couple of years the 51-year-old German-American icon has repeatedly come under fire online for starring in Intimissimi promotions with Leni, 20. Heidi Klum flaunts figure as she goes topless on luxury vacation with husband Heidi Klum and Tom Kaulitz show off out of this world E.T. Halloween costumes In November 2022, the pair were blasted for a "weird" and "disturbing" campaign for the brand, which many fans regarded as inappropriate. Their latest ad sees them in bright red silk lingerie as they pose and pout for a camera. In one shot, Leni models a black mesh and visbly see-through bra. At the end, they touch cheeks and smile. Meanwhile, Heidi, who starts off wearing long red silk pjs, strips down to a red mesh bra and flaunts her figure. The video was slammed, as one fan asked: "Which normal mom would pose together with her daughter in lingerie?" Heidi eventually turned off comments on the post. She also received backlash after appearing in a lingerie ad for Intimissimi with Leni and 80-year-old mom Erna. “Quite strange to do this with your mom,” one person commented on Leni’s post of the shoot. “This is really weird tbh,” someone else added. DON'T MISS... Heidi Klum risks wardrobe malfunction as she flashes boobs in plunging lingerie [PICTURES] The Simpsons' star fears voice actors will be replaced by AI in future [COMMENT] Kelly Osbourne looks incredible as she shows off 85lb weight loss in tiny corset [NEWS] View this post on Instagram A post shared by Heidi Klum (@heidiklum) In October 2023 fans were vocal about how disturbing they found the photos of both Heidi and Leni showing off their bodies in lingerie. Commenters on Initimissi's Instagram post were largely positive, but several followers were concerned by the mother–daughter display. "Dude that's your mom," one person bluntly said as another person added: "Family business it must be continued!" "What normal mom would pose together with her daughter in lingerie?" one concerned fan questioned. In early November, the supermodel clapped back at critics who've slammed her fashion choices in a interview. She said she isn't shy about her "femininity." “I’m not shy about my femininity,” she told The Times . “I love dressing up where I have my cleavage showing, wearing miniskirts, high heels, gorgeous stockings — but that doesn’t mean I want to go home with you.” She added: “That’s just my personality. Why not? I want to have fun and show my body, but I have boundaries, as do all women.” The mother of four touched on her daughter’s new modeling career in the interview. “My daughter is so nonchalant. For me the cameras had to become my friends. I had to learn that it’s just a person clicking away, capturing what you give: you play with the lens, not the person. She’s more of a tomboy — she won’t wear my clothes.”NEW DELHI: Fertilisers stocks were trading higher on Thursday at 10:29AM Paradeep Phosphates Ltd.(up 6.53%), Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd.(up 3.75%), The Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd.(up 3.59%), Sikko Industries Ltd.(up 2.58%), Aries Agro Ltd.(up 2.05%), National Fertilizers Ltd.(up 2.00%), Deepak Fertilisers & Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd.(up 1.71%), Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals Ltd.(up 1.64%), Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Ltd.(up 1.61%) and Zuari Agro Chemicals Ltd.(up 1.38%) were among the top gainers. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd.(down 0.52%) and Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd.(down 0.50%) were among the top losers. The NSE Nifty50 index was trading 63.5 points at 24403.95, while the 30-share BSE Sensex was down 147.82 points at 80808.51 at around 10:29AM. Bharti Airtel Ltd.(up 1.0%), Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.(up 0.65%), Infosys Ltd.(up 0.46%), Tech Mahindra Ltd.(up 0.41%), Wipro Ltd.(up 0.38%), State Bank of India(up 0.2%), Titan Company Ltd.(up 0.2%), UltraTech Cement Ltd.(up 0.17%), Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.(up 0.16%) and Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.(up 0.16%) were among the top gainers in the Nifty pack. Stock Trading Technical Trading Made Easy: Online Certification Course By - Souradeep Dey, Equity and Commodity Trader, Trainer View Program Stock Trading Stock Markets Made Easy By - elearnmarkets, Financial Education by StockEdge View Program Stock Trading Market 104: Options Trading: Kickstart Your F&O Adventure By - Saketh R, Founder- QuickAlpha, Full Time Options Trader View Program Stock Trading Options Trading Course For Beginners By - Chetan Panchamia, Options Trader View Program Stock Trading Candlesticks Made Easy: Candlestick Pattern Course By - elearnmarkets, Financial Education by StockEdge View Program Stock Trading RSI Made Easy: RSI Trading Course By - Souradeep Dey, Equity and Commodity Trader, Trainer View Program Stock Trading Complete Guide to Stock Market Trading: From Basics to Advanced By - Harneet Singh Kharbanda, Full Time Trader View Program Stock Trading Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By - Dinesh Nagpal, Full Time Trader, Ichimoku & Trading Psychology Expert View Program Stock Trading Point & Figure Chart Mastery: A Comprehensive Trading Guide By - Mukta Dhamankar, Full Time Trader, 15 Years Experience, Instructor View Program Stock Trading Options Trading Made Easy: Options Trading Course By - Anirudh Saraf, Founder- Saraf A & Associates, Chartered Accountant View Program Stock Trading Stock Valuation Made Easy By - Rounak Gouti, Investment commentary writer, Experience in equity research View Program Stock Trading Markets 102: Mastering Sentiment Indicators for Swing and Positional Trading By - Rohit Srivastava, Founder- Indiacharts.com View Program Stock Trading Mastering Options Selling: Advanced Strategies for Success By - CA Manish Singh, Chartered Accountant, Professional Equity and Derivative Trader View Program On the other hand, Bajaj Auto Ltd.(down 1.94%), NTPC Ltd.(down 1.63%), Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.(down 1.56%), SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd.(down 1.42%), JSW Steel Ltd.(down 1.36%), Cipla Ltd.(down 1.34%), Nestle India Ltd.(down 1.22%), Asian Paints Ltd.(down 1.18%), HDFC Life Insurance Company Ltd.(down 1.12%) and Shriram Finance Ltd.(down 1.02%) were trading in the red. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel )Arizona’s 2025 Hunt recommendations are availible online

India and the European Union (EU) have finalised an extensive roadmap for the green hydrogen sector that includes development of infrastructure, technology cooperation and boosting supply chains. The two sides deliberated on ways to enhance cooperation in the sector at the 10th meeting of the India-EU Energy Panel held on Thursday in Brussels. At the meeting, a "work plan" was adopted for the third phase of the India-EU Clean Energy and Climate Partnership 2025-28, which will focus on deeper cooperation in five priority areas, according to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) . The priority areas are green hydrogen, offshore wind energy, regional connectivity, electricity market integration and smart grids, energy efficiency, and energy and climate diplomacy. "The two sides have set out an extensive agenda for green hydrogen cooperation, which includes assessing infrastructure development feasibility, regulatory and technology cooperation, and strengthening of supply chains," the MEA said on Saturday. It said the energy panel focused on the energy transition priorities of the two sides and took stock of the achievements of the second phase of the India-EU Clean Energy and Climate Partnership 2021-2024. The two sides undertook and completed joint initiatives involving technical cooperation in 51 activities divided into nine sectors, it added. "The two sides have also charted out the framework for green hydrogen cooperation, which includes cooperation on green hydrogen policies of India and the EU," the MEA said. The EU and EU member states participated in the international conference on green hydrogen this year in India. On its part, India joined as an exclusive country partner of European Hydrogen Week 2024. "India and the EU also entered into long-term research commitments to jointly support research in clean energy projects as part of the India-EU trade and technology council working group on clean and green technologies, which was established in January 2023," the MEA said. ALSO READ: India responds to US sanctions on 19 entities over dual-use tech exports to Russia

Lara Trump will step down as co-chair of the Republican National Committee as she considers a number of potential options with her father-in-law, President-elect Donald Trump , set to return to the White House. Among those possibilities is replacing Florida Sen. Marco Rubio , whom Trump tapped to be the next secretary of state. If Rubio is confirmed, his replacement — who would be chosen by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis — would serve for two years until the next regularly scheduled election in 2026, at which point the seat would be up for election again. “It is something I would seriously consider,” Lara Trump told The Associated Press in an interview. “If I’m being completely transparent, I don’t know exactly what that would look like. And I certainly want to get all of the information possible if that is something that’s real for me. But yeah, I would 100% consider it.” Elected as RNC co-chair in March, Lara Trump was a key player in the Republicans retaking the White House and control of the Senate while maintaining a narrow House majority. What she does next could shape Republican politics, given her elevated political profile and her ties to the incoming president. The idea of placing a Trump family member in the Senate has been lauded in some Republican circles. Among the people pushing for her to replace Rubio is Maye Musk, mother of Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk . “The Senate is an old man’s club. We desperately need a smart, young, outspoken woman who will reveal their secrets,” she posted on X. Lara Trump is 42. Elon Musk, who was with Lara Trump on election night at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, responded to his mother’s post: “Lara Trump is genuinely great.” Led by chairman Michael Whatley and Lara Trump, the RNC invested heavily in recruiting roughly 230,000 volunteers and an army of lawyers for what it called its “election integrity” effort, four years after Donald Trump lost his reelection bid to Democrat Joe Biden, citing false or unproven theories about voter fraud. Outside groups such as Turning Point Action and Musk’s America PAC took a greater responsibility for advertising and get-out-the-vote efforts. While Whatley will remain RNC chairman, Lara Trump said she felt she had accomplished her goals in the co-chair role. “With that big win, I kind of feel like my time is up,” she said. “What I intended to do has been done.” Lara Trump praised Musk’s new endeavor, the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE , a nongovernmental task force headed by Musk and and fellow entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy . They’ve been tapped to fire federal workers , cut programs and slash federal regulations as part of Trump’s “Save America” agenda for his second term. “I really don’t think we’ve seen movement like this in our federal government since our country’s founding in many ways,” she said. “And I think if they are successful in what they plan to do, I think it is going to be transformative to America in a great way.” She said she expects a different presidency this time, beginning with the structure of the administration: While Trump’s daughter Ivanka and son-in-law Jared Kushner served as White House advisers in his last administration, Lara Trump said she doesn’t see any family member taking any position in the White House this time around with her father-in-law. “He really wants to get in there and do a good job for the four years, and that’s all he wants to serve,” she said. “Four years, and he’s out.” Lara Trump also says she expects the Republican Party to be more unified than it has ever been. When she became co-chair in May, the Trump campaign and the RNC merged, with staffers fired and positions restructured. She said the result could spell trouble for GOP lawmakers who do not agree with Trump’s agenda. “The whole party has totally shifted and totally changed,” she said. “I think people are feeling a little more bold in coming out with their political views.” This story has been corrected to clarify that Rubio’s Senate seat would be filled until 2026 when an election would be held for the seat. Linderman reported from Baltimore and Mendoza from Santa Cruz, California.Coventry City suffered their fourth away defeat of the season at in-form Burnley who scored two second half goals to take the full three points at Turf Moor. The Sky Blues did well to get to the break without conceding, having defended really well as they stayed strong and organised at the back and kept Burnley at arm’s length. The Clarets absolutely dominated the opening 45 minutes and looked a cut above in terms of their possession and movement going forward. However, for all their possession – which was 70 percent midway through the half – they had just five attempts on goal and not a single one on target. Coventry, meanwhile, didn’t have a single attempt at the other end in the opening half. The visitors, however, were opened up by a four-pass move that started and ended with Jeremy Sarmiento in the second minute into the re-start. The forward laid the ball out wide to Jaidon Anthony who played it to Connor Roberts who took it to the byline and pulled it back into the box where Sarmiento was unmarked to side foot home with an easy finish to give the Clarents the lead. Ephron Mason-Clark had the ball in the back of the net with a spectacular overhead kick from a Jack Rudoni cross but the goal was disallowed for off-side. But a minute later in the 80th Burnley doubled their lead when CJ Egan-Riley got away from Latibeaudiere in the box and moved to the byline before looping a cross-cum-shot over Brad Collins and watched as it dropped in over the line as three white City shirts attempted and fail to clear it. READ MORE: Former Premier League referee and pundits on naughty Norman READ MORE: Has Leicester sacking thrown spanner in Doug King's new manager search? STARTING FORMATION: BRAD COLLINS: 5.5 Went down after about 20 minutes signalling for medical assistance while the players ran to the touchline to get instructions from the coaches after Burnley dominated with 70 percent of possession. Didn’t have a single save to make in the opening 45 when he always made himself available for a pass back for safety. Beaten by a precise finish from the unmarked Sarmiento and saw the ball loop over his head from a tight angle for the second. JOEL LATIBEAUDIERE: 5.5/6 Deployed to the right of the back three where he was a calm and steady presence, needing to be right on top of his game to keep the threat down to a minimum from Burnley’s left flank. Threw himself into a crucial block to deny Rodriguez. Sent a header wide of the target in a rare City chance. Let Egan-Riley get away from him for the second goal. BOBBY THOMAS: 5.5/6 Read the game well early on, stepping in to intercept and anticipate passes from the opposition as City managed to keep a clean sheet to the break. Takes part of the collective resonsibility for the first goal when City were opened up and the goal scorer left unmarked in the middle of the box. LUIS BINKS: 5.5/6 Defended reasonably well and alert to dangers but hit a few stray long balls and passes. Put his body on the line with some really solid defending amid intense first half pressure with shots coming in from left, right and centre. However, stretched for the goal opening goal. MILAN VAN EWIJK: 6 Beaten early on by overlapping left-back Pires as he had his work cut out but defended pretty well in a difficult first half when City came under intense pressure, albeit not too many clear cut chances from the home side. More of an attackig threat after the break. JOSH ECCLES: 6 Lively and hard-working in midfield and made decent use of the ball when he had it, trying to protect City’s possession when they had it. BEN SHEAF: 6 Toiled away in the midfield battleground on a difficult night when Burnley bossed the ball. Tackled well to in back possession and played Torp in for a rare City shot. JAY DASILVA: 5.5 Had his hands full with pacy wide man Jaidon Anthony who he needed to get closer to but defended reasonably well in a largely backs to the wall first half. Stretched for the goal. TATSUHIRO SAKAMOTO: 5.5 Deployed at the top f the midfield box alongside Torp, the Japanese forward pressed and chased from the first whistle as Burnley dominated possession. Unable to really affect the game with his attacking talents in the first half. More of a threat when City switched formation. VICTOR TORP: 5.5/6 Operated at the top of the box with Sakamoto and constantly attempted to play Bassette in behind whenever he got the ball NORMAN BASSETTE: 5.5/6 Deployed as a lone striker with City attempting to play him in behind and use his pace. Took an early booking for continuing to play and put the ball in the net after being played through by Sheaf with the flag going up for off-side. Starved of service but ran himself into the ground. SUBSTITUTES: JACK RUDONI (62 mins, for Dasilva): 5 Added energy and an attacking threat as City attempted to get back on level terms EPHRON MASON-CLARK (62 mins, for Bassette): 5.5 Lively and threatening from the left flank and had a spectacular overhead kick goal disallowed for off-side. ELLIS SIMMS (62 mins, for Torp): 5 Put himself about well and added a bit of muscle up top as City were chasing the game. BRANDON THOMAS-ASANTE (84 mins, for Sheaf): JAKE BIDWELL (84 mins, for Sheaf): Subs (not used): Oliver Dovin (GK), Liam Kitching, Jamie Allen, Kai Andrews. BURNLEY ( 4-2-3-1): James Trafford; Connor Roberts, CJ Egan-Riley, Maxime Esteve, Lucas Pires; Josh Cullen, Josh Laurant; Jaidon Anthony, Hanibal, Jeremy Sarmiento (67 mins, for Luca Koleosho); Jay Rodriguez. Subs (not used): Vaclav Hladky (GK), Shurandy Sambo, John Egan, Han-Noah Massengo, Owen Dodgson, Nathan Redmond, Andreas Hountondji, Bashir Humphreys. GOALS: CLARETS: Sarmiento (47), Egan-Riley (80) SKY BLUES: REFEREE: Anthony Backhouse ATTENDANCE: NEXT UP: Cardiff City (h) Saturday, November 30 (3pm).NEW YORK: Oil futures fell nearly 2% on Wednesday as investors awaited an imminent Opec+ decision on production cuts, while a larger-than-expected draw in US crude stockpiles last week lent some support to prices. Brent crude futures fell US$1.31, or 1.78%, to settle at US$72.31 a barrel. US West Texas Intermediate crude futures fell US$1.40, or 2%, to US$68.54. On Tuesday, Brent posted its biggest gain in two weeks, rising by 2.5%. The market was on tenterhooks, with investors focused on the upcoming Opec+ meeting, analysts said. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies in Opec+ meet on Thursday, and are likely extend output cuts until the end of the first quarter of next year, industry sources told Reuters. "While a delay to unwinding production cuts is expected, the rhetoric out of the meeting is going to have the biggest sway," said Matt Smith, Kpler lead Americas oil analyst. Opec+ has been looking to phase out supply cuts through next year. A single bank sold a large volume of US oil futures contracts in early afternoon trading on Wednesday, a source told Reuters, pushing prices down more than 1% within minutes and causing traders to scramble to decipher the reason. US crude stocks fell more than expected last week as refiners ramped up operations, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) said. Gasoline and distillate stockpiles rose by more than expected during the week. "A pop in refining activity with runs climbing to a high not seen since the summer has resulted in a see-saw of crude inventories drawing and products building," Smith said. The bullish momentum only lent some support to prices. A shaky ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, South Korea's curtailed declaration of martial law and a rebel offensive in Syria that threatens to draw in forces from several oil-producing countries all lent support to oil prices, said Priyanka Sachdeva, senior market analyst at Phillip Nova. In the Middle East, Israel said on Tuesday it would return to war with Hezbollah if their truce collapses and that its attacks would go deeper into Lebanon and target the state itself. In South Korea, lawmakers have submitted a bill to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol after his declaration of martial law on Tuesday, which was reversed within hours, sparking a political crisis in Asia's fourth-largest economy. — Reuters

Black Irish by Mariah Carey: The Ultimate Holiday Gift for Every Celebration

The Greater-Income-In-Retirement Portfolio, Using ETFs

A shiny new tractor is pulling a huge orange trailer, while a commentator explains how best to manoeuvre it to tip grain, watched by a group of farmers wrapped up warmly in wellies, coats and bobble hats, some holding spaniels on leads. Others are checking out the latest models of combine harvesters and crop sprayers, parked on snowy ground at the Midlands Machinery Show, but few seem to be buying, and the changes to inheritance tax for agricultural properties announced in Rachel Reeves’s October budget are never far from anyone’s lips. On a crisp and sunny November day, the mood at one of the UK’s largest agricultural machinery shows was anything but bright. A frosty chill has also descended on the network of companies dependent on farm businesses purveying their wares in Newark. Machinery manufacturers and dealers, as well as building companies and suppliers, have a similar refrain: customers stopped calling straight after the chancellor set out the budget measures affecting the agricultural sector. “The phone got a lot quieter from the second she [Reeves] announced it,” says Jonathan Richardson, sales manager at Browns of Wem, a Shropshire-based company which designs, makes and constructs steel-framed and timber-sectioned buildings. “It’s had the quickest impact we have ever seen.” Previously, farming businesses qualified for 100% relief on inheritance tax on agricultural and business property. However, budget changes will see the tax imposed on farms worth over £1m, with an effective rate of 20% on assets above that threshold, rather than the normal 40% rate for inheritance tax. Labour has said farms worth £3m could end up being exempt , as married couples can each claim £1m tax-free, in addition to a family home worth up to £1m. “People tend to ring us in the first instance when they start thinking about [a new building]: those calls have stopped,” Richardson says, on the company’s stand at the Newark show, flanked by photos of farm buildings erected by the firm. Any belt-tightening and deferral of purchases by farmers would have a big effect on Browns of Wem, which depends on agricultural businesses for at least 90% of its trade. It would also send shockwaves through the network of companies – selling every­thing from tractors to tyres and farm gates to fertiliser – which make up the rural economy. “We are OK, we have a decent order book, but it is a lot quieter than it was,” says Richardson. “We are hoping this is just a blip and confidence will recover.” Taking place a day after thousands of farmers and landowners protested against the budget measures on the streets of London, signs propped on one display tractor warn “Don’t bite the hand that feeds you” and “Save a farmer, remove Starmer”, underlining the strength of feeling in the farming community. The Treasury is understood to be assessing the impact of inheritance tax changes, including amending gifting rules for over-80s , which could allow them to pass on their farm to their heirs tax-free without having to live for seven years after making the gift. Officials are also understood to be assessing the impact of budget measures on active small and medium-sized farms compared with smallholdings. Some of the largest machines on display, such as massive tractors and combine harvesters, are manufactured abroad and shipped to the UK to be sold by networks of dealers. “We are a dying breed, UK manufacturers,” says Graham Cherry, sitting inside a warm show stand, looking at the agricultural material handling equipment made by his company, Cherry Products, displayed outside in the snow. Their machinery attachments – including pallet forks, grain lifters and snowploughs – sell for between £2,000 and £8,000. “That’s why we are selling, and those selling £100,000 tractors are struggling,” he says, pointing at a nearby stand. “To survive, we need profitable farmers in the UK who will invest,” he says. “It has been terrible since the budget: they are all sitting with their head in their hands.” The company is dependent on British agriculture since exports dried up after Britain left the EU. “Brexit killed it: people don’t want the hassle,” Cherry says. He adds: “Everyone you speak to is down: worst harvests, wettest harvests, wettest drilling time and now this, another nail in the coffin.” The son of a farm worker, Cherry founded his business almost 45 years ago near Chipping Norton in the Cotswolds. “Next to Jeremy Clarkson’s farm , before you ask,” he says. Sign up to Observed Analysis and opinion on the week's news and culture brought to you by the best Observer writers after newsletter promotion Amid such a difficult outlook, Cherry worries that a prolonged downturn will force him to “make difficult decisions”, which could involve redundancies among his 30 staff. “For lots of people who make a living off farms and selling machinery to farm businesses, this [the budget] has a direct impact for us and them,” says Michael Grey, a regional sales manager at Farol, a family-owned dealership selling large equipment including tractors made by the US heavy machinery maker John Deere and telehandlers from German manufacturer Kramer. Farol, based in Oxfordshire, has some of the biggest pieces of kit on display, with correspondingly big prices. One of the newest models of self-propelled crop sprayers would set a farmer back over £370,000, while a mid-size tractor on the stand costs about £170,000. “Purchase-wise, farmers are trying to work it out,” says Grey’s colleague Tom Hinchley, an area sales manager. “One or two have talked to us about different types of ownership – that could be leasing, so it doesn’t go down as an asset.” Despite the huge cost involved, some farmers have traditionally upgraded their machinery every three to five years, to take advantage of new technology. Some in the sector feel that could be about to change. “Less footfall and closed wallets,” says Matthew Derby, describing the mood at the show while discussing the budget measures over a quick lunch with two other Lincolnshire farmers. “The effect on cash flow is obvious.” For the third-generation food producer, uncertainty over future tax liabilities means his family is evaluating its spending. “With ongoing replacement policy, we would change something every year, but we will now look to push that back until we have more clarity,” he says, in between bites of a burger. “At the point where investment in capital items is adding value and is taxable, that is a big concern.” One of the few companies to be deluged with requests is Brown and Co, a property and business consultancy. “The phone has not stopped ringing,” says land agent and partner Charlie Bryant. “No one should underestimate the angst that the whole budget has caused in the farming community.” The government has insisted that most farms will not be affected by the changes, although this has been rejected by the National Farmers Union (NFU) . Farming representatives have said the changes will force some family farms to sell up in order to pay their inheritance tax bills. Bryant, who is based in Lincolnshire, carries out 200 stock-taking valuations on farms of differing sizes each year, visiting them to calculate the value of land, machinery and other assets for their annual accounts. “I have been through my list and I haven’t found one yet who will be under £1m. That is 100% of my annual stock-taking valuation, before you start adding in crops in ground, crops in store, machinery,” he says. “If the government are trying to aim for a certain section of society, very wealthy people who have bought land for inheritance tax, I think they are wildly off the mark. The knife is going a lot deeper than I’d like to think they envisaged.” Bryant is worried that inheritance tax changes could be the final straw for some farmers. “Farm economics being particularly poor, it is pretty brutal out there,” he says. “The word distraught has come up an enormous number of times, and we need to be careful of that.”The King seemed amused as he laughed at British comedian Matt Forde’s impression of President-elect Donald Trump on the stage of the Royal Variety Performance. Charles attended the show at the Royal Albert Hall in London for the first time as patron of the Royal Variety charity, following in the footsteps of his mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II. In a statement from Buckingham Palace, he said: “The charity’s crucial work in assisting those who have fallen ill, had an accident or hit hard times is as essential now as it ever has been. “I would like to thank all of those who have worked so hard to stage this year’s production and wish everyone a very enjoyable evening.” The performance saw political comic Forde reference the unfounded claims Mr Trump repeated during his presidential debate against Democrat candidate Kamala Harris earlier this year, that illegal immigrants from Haiti were eating locals’ pets in the small Ohio city of Springfield. Forde exclaimed in the president-elect’s voice: “They’re eating the cats, they’re eating the dogs!” He then turned to address Charles from the stage, saying in Mr Trump’s voice: “Your Majesty King Charles, you’re named after a spaniel – be very careful, they’ll eat you alive.” The King was seen laughing in response to the joke from the royal box. Charles appeared at the event without the Queen, who insisted the “show must go on” after pulling out of attending the performance on Friday evening as doctors advised that she should prioritise rest. A Buckingham Palace spokesperson said: “Following a recent chest infection, the Queen continues to experience some lingering post-viral symptoms, as a result of which doctors have advised that, after a busy week of engagements, Her Majesty should prioritise sufficient rest. “With great regret, she has therefore withdrawn from attendance at tonight’s Royal Variety Performance. His Majesty will attend as planned.” A royal source said the Queen was “naturally disappointed to miss the evening’s entertainments and sends her sincere apologies to all those involved, but is a great believer that ‘the show must go on'”. “She hopes to be back to full strength and regular public duties very soon,” the source added. The Royal Variety Performance will air on ITV1, ITVX, STV and STV Player in December. Money raised from the show will go to help people from the world of entertainment in need of care and assistance, with the Royal Variety Charity launching an initiative to help those with mental health issues this year.

Central Faces Edison of Huntington Beach for D1-A State Football TitleJ eff Jarvis was born in 1954 and studied journalism at Illinois’s Northwestern University. He worked as a TV critic and created the magazine Entertainment Weekly , later leading the online arm of US media company Advance Publications. Since 2001, he has been blogging at Buzzmachine.com and in 2005 he became an associate professor at City University of New York’s graduate school of journalism, directing its new media programme before retiring last year. Jarvis, who lives in New York, is the co-host of the podcasts This Week in Google and AI Inside . What made you want to write your new book, The Web We Weave ? My glib answer is that somebody has to defend the freedoms of the internet because I fear they’re under attack. It’s important to say that I’m not defending the corporations or current proprietors of the internet, but I do think that moral panic over the net will lead to regulation that will affect freedoms for all. This turned into more of a critique of media’s coverage than I had predicted. Why do you think the media turned against the internet and big tech? Media have been engaged in moral panics going way back. What separates this media moral panic from others is the conflict of interest involved: in the media’s view, this new technology competes with them for both audience and advertising dollars – and that is rarely revealed. In my book, I chronicle the failures of Rupert Murdoch on the internet and the billions of dollars that he wasted. He decided to turn on it because he couldn’t succeed at it. The Wall Street Journal fired the first shot with a series demonising the cookie and ad targeting. Yes, but social media give a megaphone to our worst instincts and voices... It does that, but it also enables communities who were not there before to come together. To be clear, I’m an old white guy who learns things very late in life, but I’ve learned a lot by reading the scholars of Black Twitter – André Brock Jr, Charlton McIlwain, Meredith Clark. The internet also enabled these communities to come together in a way that they could not gather because they were not heard in mass media. In the book, you tell Shoshana Zuboff and other critics of surveillance capitalism to get a grip. Why? I object to Zuboff’s use of the term “surveillance”, especially today when we have governments that have behind them the power of law, imprisonment, fine and weapons as they surveil populaces. And so to trivialise surveillance by characterising advertising cookies as that is offensive to me and overblown. Should there be changes around ad targeting? Sure, but I don’t think it starts with that kind of a klaxon call. It feels intuitively right to me whenever someone says that phones and social media are negatively affecting our mental health. Why do you push back on that? As I read the literature on this, it’s clear that the research is far from definitive either way. When we blame the phone for young people’s problems , we once again pass over the much more serious issues. In the US, children are afraid to go to school for [fear of] getting shot. Young women evermore have no control over their bodies. They are inheriting a climate that we fucked up. They are in the midst of a fascist takeover of the country. Oh yeah, let’s blame the phones. What’s your take on AI? I’m more frightened of the AI boys than I am of their AI. The problem is they have corrupted the language around it, so the word “safety” is now meaningless because the doomsters treat safety as them not destroying humankind, when there are very real safety issues that need to be dealt with around bias and fraud and the environment and so on. So it’s difficult to have the conversation now because we don’t have common terms. What impact will the Trump administration have on regulation – and more broadly on your vision for reclaiming the internet? I think you’re going to find the companies themselves not regulated, unless Donald Trump doesn’t like them. And this is what we saw at the last minute with [Jeff] Bezos’s horrid Washington Post editorial decision and with Meta trying to back away from all politics. No one wants to make judgments because it’s expensive and risky to do so. On the one hand, we’ll find companies and investors run wild. On the other, we will see some vindictive action from the Trumpists against certain companies because they have this belief that they’ve been discriminated against. Are you surprised by how far to the right certain Silicon Valley billionaires have leaned? I think one shouldn’t be surprised about the corrupting venality of billions of dollars and I think that’s what we saw at work in some of those cases. The argument that I heard during the election was: “Well, maybe the moguls have gone to the right, but the workers have not.” I don’t know. It wasn’t that long ago when employees at Google revolted over machine learning and defence. So far, I’m not hearing any rumblings of a worker revolt from Anthropic against working with evil empire Palantir for defence contracts. So I don’t know where the pulse of Silicon Valley will be, and I fear that it could go farther right all around or farther into a safety cave. Sign up to Observed Analysis and opinion on the week's news and culture brought to you by the best Observer writers after newsletter promotion Do you think Trump’s relationship with Elon Musk will go the distance? [laughs] God knows. It’s often said that they both want centre stage, so this won’t work, but Trump loves billionaires and crazy, outlandish talk. And Musk, obviously, loves being at the centre of power. His investment in Twitter seemed insane, and it certainly was damaging, but it gave him this power, and this power led to Tesla stock going up. So it probably turned out to be a good investment – in ruining America. I don’t think he’s going to disappear. One of your solutions for making a better internet is to demote the geeks. That feels hard to imagine . Yeah, but looking back at history, it becomes less difficult. Printers were all-important at the beginning, they made every decision and then they were just hired to do an industrial job. Radio, similarly, was a kind of mysterious technology until it wasn’t, and I think the same will be true of the internet and, eventually, AI. With AI, I think that, ironically – and unintentionally – it’s the geeks demoting themselves. I’m not a coder but I can now have a computer do what I want it to do without coders. Eventually, it’s not hard to imagine that anyone can tell the machine what they want to do and it will then do it without the technologists. The Web We Weave: Why We Must Reclaim the Internet from Moguls, Misanthropes, and Moral Panic by Jeff Jarvis is published by Basic Books on 5 December (£25). To support the Guardian and Observer order your copy at guardianbookshop.com . Delivery charges may apply

Police Minister Mark Mitchell claims alignment on 500 extra officers target despite concerns from policeWith a recession deepening and the 1982 midterm elections approaching, Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker was summoned to the Oval Office, where Ronald Reagan was sitting with his chief of staff, James Baker. When Baker said Reagan wanted to give Volcker an “order” about interest rates, the 6-foot-7 central banker immediately stalked silently from the room. He did not take orders. Donald Trump is determined to break institutions to the presidential saddle, so people wonder: Could he fire the head of the Fed? (Probably not. Besides, Chair Jerome H. Powell’s term expires in May 2026.) More interesting questions are: What is the Fed for? And is its “independence” a license for mission creep? John H. Cochrane and Amit Seru of the Hoover Institution think the hyperactive Fed has become too ambitious in its interventions in the economy and social policy. Their proposal is the title of their essay “Ending Bailouts, At Last” in the Journal of Law, Economics and Policy. The problematic behavior is a century old and bipartisan: When large financial institutions are in danger of failing, government bails them out by bailing out their creditors. The 1907 financial crisis led in 1913 to the Federal Reserve Act establishing the Fed, which did not prevent the 1933 bank collapse. This led to deposit insurance and many regulations, which did not prevent Continental Illinois Bank’s 1984 failure, the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s and many other bumps on the road to 2008. “Never again, we say, again and again,” wrote Cochrane and Seru. Bailouts multiply, larger each time, spreading to highly leveraged industrial companies, as in the auto bailout of 2009. “Too leveraged to fail,” they wrote, “might be the summary of our new regime.” Too leveraged is a consequence of interest rates too low for too long, combined with confidence that the bailout culture is forever and unlimited. During the pandemic, the market for Treasury bonds became fragile, so the Fed lent bond dealers money to buy the bonds, “then turned around and bought the Treasurys from the dealers a few days later.” Cochrane and Seru wrote that the Fed almost has an implicit policy of buying “whatever quantity” necessary to prop up corporate bond prices. They noted that the Biden administration’s “paycheck protection” program made “forgivable loans” — Washington-speak for gifts — “to small businesses with 500 or fewer employees to cover their business costs, including mortgage interests, rent, utilities and up to eight weeks’ payroll costs.” It is one thing for the accountable political institutions to do this, quite another for the Fed to lend “on lenient terms to the real economy, not just the financial sector.” Throughout the economy, Cochrane and Seru wrote, leverage has been rewarded: “If you saved and bought a house with cash, if you saved and went to a cheaper college rather than take out a big student loan, or if you repaid that loan promptly, you did not get money.” In today’s permanent central-bank-run credit system, “Borrow. Borrow especially if you are big or part of a big and politically influential class of borrowers. As with student loans, borrow from the government.” You might not have to pay it back. When Silicon Valley Bank accepted many large, uninsured deposits, then got in trouble, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. — the government — guaranteed all deposits. So now, wrote Cochrane and Seru, “effectively markets expect all deposits of any size to be guaranteed going forward, at least during any newsworthy event.” The Congressional Budget Office projects budget deficits of 5% to 8% of gross domestic product forever. And this, Cochrane and Seru correctly believe, is too unrealistic. CBO assumes no crises, recessions, wars, pandemaics or — most laughably — spending increases. But even this optimistic debt path “simply cannot happen.” “We have,” Cochrane and Seru wrote, “once-in-a-century crises every 10 years these days.” “Crisis” has come to mean “the possibility that someone, somewhere might lose money.” And “contagion” now denotes a vague fear that “any ripple anywhere might bring down the financial system.” Societies get what they incentivize. Moral hazards — incentives for perverse, risky behaviors — are now sown throughout American life. Cumulatively, they might break the government before Trump’s eccentric Cabinet nominees can. Will writes for The Washington Post. Get local news delivered to your inbox!

Related hot word search:

Previous: lottery results today
Next: