how to make lobby in roblox studio
2025-01-08   

how to make lobby in roblox studio
how to make lobby in roblox studio PM: Energy important pillar of bilateral ties, reflects deep trustCiv 7 Releases on PC February 11, 2025 Sid Meier’s Civilization VII is almost here, and it’s shaping up to be a considerably more console-friendly experience than its predecessor was at launch. With Firaxis and 2K Games placing importance on fluid gamepad control, the future of Civ 7 on Steam Deck (and other PC handhelds like the ROG Ally and Legion GO) already looked bright. And today it looks even brighter with the game’s newly updated PC requirements for the native Linux version. Civ 7 on Linux: Minimum PC Requirements Here’s the baseline hardware you’ll need to run the official Linux version of Civilization VII. This setup should deliver 1080p/30FPS at the low graphics quality preset: Curiously, the minimum requirements for the Windows version shows an Nvidia GTX 1050, while on Linux the developer lists a GTX 1060. Still, it’s refreshing to see a PC game in 2025 that isn’t abandoning millions of gamers with steep minimum requirements like hardware-level ray tracing. How does this translate for Steam Deck users? At first glance, it may seem like they’re out of luck. After all, the equivalent desktop GPUs to the Steam Deck are widely acknowledged as being the Nvidia GTX 1050Ti or the AMD Radeon RX 570. Those are just below the graphics cards listed for Civ 7’s minimum Linux requirements. But consider that Steam Deck is also running at a lower resolution — 1280x800 versus the desktop standard of 1920x1080. Thus, I feel confident saying Civ 7 will run smoothly on Deck — it should even end up becoming Steam Deck certified. And don’t worry, Ubuntu is not a hard requirement. Rather, people running Ubuntu should ensure they’re using 22.04 or higher, and that’s mainly down to having updated software libraries to ensure a reliable gaming experience on Steam. Certainly, any current Linux distro (like Fedora, Zorin OS, Bazzite, or Mint) running a modern kernel should fit the bill. Forget Chrome—Google Starts Tracking All Your Devices In 8 Weeks Bitcoin Suddenly Surges Back To $100,000 On Huge $20 Trillion Price Prediction FBI Warns Gmail, Outlook, Apple Mail Users—Check 3 Things To Stop Attacks Does Civ 7 Even Need A Linux Version? As Firaxis did with Civilization VI, the developer is once again gracing Linux users with a dedicated version of Civilization VII. (MacOS users will also get a dedicated port, provided the Mac is powered by Apple Silicon). It’s honestly a surprising decision given the state of Valve’s Proton, the compatibility layer that helps Windows games run (and run well ) on Linux and the SteamOS-powered Steam Deck. When Civ 6 released in 2018, Steam Proton was in its first few months of existence, the Steam Deck didn’t exist, and the state of Linux gaming had barely begun its positive upward trajectory. A native Linux version certainly made sense then, especially for a game that was — at the time it launched — a decidedly PC-forward experience. Firaxis doesn’t need to do this in 2025, just as Hello Games didn’t need to produce a constant stream of major content updates for No Man’s Sky after the game had more than earned its years-long comeback story. But goodwill goes a long way. There’s another reason, though. Proton isn’t foolproof or bulletproof. We frequently see game updates that break the fragile state of compatibility with Linux. Sometimes this results in degraded performance; sometimes it results in the game no longer running at all. With a dedicated Linux version, there is no guesswork about which Proton version to use. No unintentional breakage. The developer is in full control of ensuring gamers have the best experience possible. And with Linux gaming on the rise, this is a good look for game developers to have. Civilization VII releases February 11, 2025, and I’m very much looking forward to testing performance of both the Linux native version and the Steam Proton version. Stay tuned for that!



Riley scores 18, Utah Tech beats Denver 68-54ELKO — The next time you have a cup of coffee at an Elko restaurant, it very well may be coming from a local roaster that imports its beans from Guatemala and other areas. “I love the idea of coffee. I love the fact that it always seemed like very few people drink it alone when they are out. They are always with somebody else,” said Garret Kamps, owner and manager of Collective Coffee Roasters in Elko. “ It's kind of a shared habit. It's a shared delight and I love that about it.” His love of coffee and that habit sprung from his younger days. “Quite a few years ago, I was young and just interested in trying to figure out what was good, what would wake me up in the morning,” he said. Living in Reno at the time, he visited a local coffee shop and noticed how there were several varieties of coffee on display, ready for sampling. Garret Kamps, owner and manager of Collective Coffee Roasters, poses in front of bags of coffee. Photo provided by Collective Coffee Roasters. “I just started trying things and started developing a taste for what was good. And, living in Reno, there was a lot of access to good coffee and so we kind of just built our taste and built our preferences.” Kamps said when he moved back to his hometown of Elko a number of years ago, he realized it didn’t have a coffee-roasting scene or a specialty coffee line. “So, we started roasting ourselves at home to try to fill that gap, because it was so expensive to ship coffee in. After a while, we realized this could be really fun. We could actually make a go of this. So, we gathered some friends of ours together to experiment and try some things. We went in together on some equipment and we started a small business.” They also had a particular aim — to sell specialty coffee, Kamps said. The Specialty Coffee Association defines specialty coffee as scoring 83 or higher on their rating scale, he explained. “There are a lot of things at the farms, the way that the coffee is grown and the way that the coffee is processed, that can help achieve those kinds of scores and goals,” he said. “Specialty coffee is kind of the cream of the crop. It's the top end of coffee production and so that's what we're shooting for.” Collective Coffee Roasters does very little blending, Kamps said. “Most of those coffees are so good on their own, coming from either a single farm or a single region,” he said. “We try to offer mostly single-origin coffees to our customers. Mostly, we have a few blends that are just for people who are maybe getting started or maybe people who focus on espresso,” Kamps said. “But for the most part, we're trying to showcase the work that these farms are doing to produce really good coffee.” “We are mainly, right now, a wholesale coffee supplier. So, we supply cafes and restaurants and hotels and things like that,” Kamps explained. “We also have our own retail side, which is mostly done online — so, people sign up for subscriptions and things like that, and it's either shipped to them or delivered,” he said. “We actually do free local delivery. We have a van that goes around that's logoed, and we deliver coffee that way, right to people's homes every week,” he explained. “The bulk of our business is actually getting unbrewed, just roasted, coffee beans directly to cafes or churches or businesses or individuals.” Collective Coffee Roasters also runs a brand called Reformation Roasters, which supplies coffee to churches and supports church planting efforts. “We would love to continue growing,” Garret Kamps said. “We love being a local roaster here in Elko but we also want to see Elko on the map nationally for coffee. We think that would be really cool if Elko was known for good coffee.” He said the company is “working hard,” especially with marketing professional Jaclyn Trice, “to help raise awareness of our brand through social media and through the Specialty Coffee Association, even, to be noticed and recognized at a national level." "We'd love that,” he said. “At some point in the future, to better serve Elko, we probably will offer a slow bar, which is a place where you can come in and sit and get coffee, no window. It'll all be slow service — sit down and experience the product in the community. That will be our goal. We're probably looking at about 12 months for that.” Along with working in the coffee business, Kamps is also a pastor at Living Stones Church in Elko. He said teamwork is an important ingredient in balancing his two passions. “Collective Coffee Roasters has always been a team effort,” he said. It's always been a group of like minded people who've come together to produce a really good product, and so with that shared labor, with the shared work between our partners, we're able to balance the workload. You know, I'm not the only one there.” His wife Delynn Kamps is the head roaster. “She's amazing at what she does,” her husband said. He also said co-owner Casey Parish has done “incredible work” as a business partner. “He's really the nuts and bolts of making everything go and making everything work. He and I were just in our new space that we just moved into, putting up shelving and organizing everything and getting everything ready to look good,” Garret Kamps said. “I'm kind of the chief financial officer,” he added. “I do a lot of the bookkeeping. And as well as sales, I try to keep our customers happy and find new ones.” Customers who support the business in Elko are supporting coffee producers, he said. “Because of the work that we're doing in Elko — Elko gets to be a part of something huge happening around the world,” he said. “Florencio Villatoro is our farmer who produces coffee for us and many others,” out of the remote region of Cuilco, Guatemala. “We don't have local growers, but we're a local roaster. There's no coffee that's grown in the [continental] United States, because coffee is grown in this thin band around the equator of the world. And it can only be grown there because those are the places where the growing season is long enough to support coffee growth,” Kamps explained. “The coffee that we get is mostly processed by hand,” he noted. “It's picked by hand. It's sorted by hand. And then there is some machinery that goes into taking the coffee cherry off of the coffee bean — because they're these little cherries that start green and then they go yellow and then they go red. When they're a certain color of red, that's when they're ripest,” which is why high-quality coffee is hand-picked, he explained. A coffee plant with several beans at a Guatamalan farm. “There's no machine that can do that, because the coffee ripens at different stages on the same branch,” he said. “The coffee is either naturally processed, which is where they allow that cherry to dry on the coffee bean and then they take the cherry off as almost a raisin-like material — or it's washed, which is where they actually use a rudimentary mechanical system in most of the farms that we go to, to remove that cherry as it's ripe and it hasn't dried.” He said it then goes on to dry. “It goes into these big drying beds, where it's then moved by hand to allow the air and the sunlight to dry it. Then, it goes off to a big polishing station or dry mill. There's this little husk left on the coffee bean. They remove that, they get it all cleaned up and then they package it — and that's how we receive it,” he said. After the company receives the coffee, it is weighed and goes on to the German-made coffee roaster to produce a roasted product, he explained. “From there, it's actually hand-packaged as well and hand-bagged. So it's a very person-intensive process.” For the production of specialty coffee, “each bean is probably touched by 40 different hands by the time it gets to you. That's an incredible amount of work, an incredible amount of labor, that goes into producing something,” Garret Kamps said. “I think it's so cool that Elko gets to be a part of that. Elko is experiencing something that is so much bigger than it.” Get the latest local business news delivered FREE to your inbox weekly. Reporter {{description}} Email notifications are only sent once a day, and only if there are new matching items.

The Australian Senate committee has thrown its weight behind a controversial bill aiming to ban social media for children under 16. This landmark decision could place Australia among nations with the toughest online controls, as it pushes for stringent age verification measures including biometrics. This legislative effort, endorsed by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's government and the opposition Liberal party, is set to be fast-tracked before the parliamentary year ends. The Senate's environment and communications committee emphasized the importance of exploring alternative age assurance methods without compromising user privacy. Major tech players like Google, Meta, and TikTok have voiced significant reservations, citing the need for more deliberation. Companies violating the proposed law could face fines up to A$49.5 million. The debate continues as stakeholders balance security with youth engagement and user rights. (With inputs from agencies.)CIBC Asset Management Inc bought a new position in shares of Taylor Morrison Home Co. ( NYSE:TMHC – Free Report ) during the 3rd quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the SEC. The fund bought 3,129 shares of the construction company’s stock, valued at approximately $220,000. A number of other institutional investors have also recently modified their holdings of the business. Principal Financial Group Inc. grew its stake in shares of Taylor Morrison Home by 3.5% during the 3rd quarter. Principal Financial Group Inc. now owns 2,051,580 shares of the construction company’s stock worth $144,144,000 after purchasing an additional 69,222 shares during the period. Bank of New York Mellon Corp grew its position in Taylor Morrison Home by 0.4% during the second quarter. Bank of New York Mellon Corp now owns 1,066,470 shares of the construction company’s stock worth $59,125,000 after buying an additional 4,638 shares during the period. Assenagon Asset Management S.A. increased its holdings in Taylor Morrison Home by 271.0% in the third quarter. Assenagon Asset Management S.A. now owns 896,032 shares of the construction company’s stock valued at $62,955,000 after buying an additional 654,541 shares in the last quarter. Allspring Global Investments Holdings LLC increased its holdings in Taylor Morrison Home by 7.6% in the third quarter. Allspring Global Investments Holdings LLC now owns 846,270 shares of the construction company’s stock valued at $59,459,000 after buying an additional 60,021 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Wedge Capital Management L L P NC lifted its position in shares of Taylor Morrison Home by 1.5% during the 3rd quarter. Wedge Capital Management L L P NC now owns 738,830 shares of the construction company’s stock valued at $51,910,000 after acquiring an additional 10,911 shares during the period. 95.16% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors. Taylor Morrison Home Stock Up 2.3 % Shares of NYSE:TMHC opened at $71.07 on Friday. The company has a current ratio of 6.24, a quick ratio of 0.69 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.37. The firm has a market cap of $7.35 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 9.19 and a beta of 1.96. The stock’s 50-day moving average price is $69.40 and its two-hundred day moving average price is $63.50. Taylor Morrison Home Co. has a 12-month low of $44.32 and a 12-month high of $74.69. Analysts Set New Price Targets Several equities analysts recently weighed in on TMHC shares. Wedbush raised Taylor Morrison Home from a “neutral” rating to an “outperform” rating and raised their price objective for the company from $65.00 to $85.00 in a research note on Friday, October 25th. BTIG Research increased their target price on Taylor Morrison Home from $78.00 to $86.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Thursday, October 24th. StockNews.com raised Taylor Morrison Home from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a report on Thursday, October 24th. Royal Bank of Canada increased their price objective on Taylor Morrison Home from $74.00 to $77.00 and gave the company an “outperform” rating in a research note on Thursday, October 24th. Finally, Barclays boosted their target price on shares of Taylor Morrison Home from $72.00 to $75.00 and gave the company an “equal weight” rating in a research note on Thursday, October 24th. Two research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and seven have issued a buy rating to the stock. According to MarketBeat.com, Taylor Morrison Home has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $77.33. Read Our Latest Stock Analysis on Taylor Morrison Home Insider Activity In related news, EVP Darrell Sherman sold 26,757 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, October 28th. The shares were sold at an average price of $70.00, for a total value of $1,872,990.00. Following the transaction, the executive vice president now owns 109,217 shares in the company, valued at approximately $7,645,190. This trade represents a 19.68 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which is accessible through the SEC website . Also, Director William H. Lyon sold 9,075 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Thursday, November 7th. The stock was sold at an average price of $72.08, for a total transaction of $654,126.00. Following the sale, the director now owns 2,136,241 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $153,980,251.28. This represents a 0.42 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . Insiders sold 104,337 shares of company stock valued at $7,356,683 in the last ninety days. Company insiders own 3.50% of the company’s stock. Taylor Morrison Home Company Profile ( Free Report ) Taylor Morrison Home Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public homebuilder in the United States. The company designs, builds, and sells single and multi-family detached and attached homes; and develops lifestyle and master-planned communities. It develops and constructs multi-use properties consisting of commercial space, retail, and multi-family properties under the Urban Form brand name. Further Reading Want to see what other hedge funds are holding TMHC? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Taylor Morrison Home Co. ( NYSE:TMHC – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Taylor Morrison Home Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Taylor Morrison Home and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .

Intel’s interim co-CEOs, Michelle Johnston Holthaus and David Zinsner, have opened the door to a possible spinoff of Intel’s foundry and manufacturing division, giving insight into Intel’s woes and Pat Gelsinger’s ouster. Intel surprised the industry when it that CEO Pat Gelsinger was retiring. Although the company and Gelsinger put a positive spin on it, reports soon indicated that Gelsinger was given a choice of being fired or retiring, making his retirement nothing short of an ouster. In the days since, critics and industry experts have been trying to piece together what happened and where the breakdown between Gelsinger and Intel occurred. The Manufacturing Question One of the hallmarks of Gelsinger’s attempt to turn Intel around was his emphasis on reinvigorating the company’s in-house manufacturing, something that sets it apart from much of the industry, as it both designs and builds its own chips. Unfortunately, in recent years, Intel’s manufacturing has fallen behind its competitors, especially TSMC. The company even had to outsource some of its manufacturing to TSMC, an embarrassing state of affairs for a company that was once king of the semiconductor industry. Gelsinger’s tenure marked a return to the company’s focus on manufacturing, with the executive even for losing the “maniacal” focus on manufacturing the company once had. A major component of Gelsinger’s focus on manufacturing was an attempt to position Intel as a TSMC competitor in the field of custom foundry services for other companies, with hopes to , Nvidia, Qualcomm, Amazon, and others. Despite Gelsinger’s efforts, Intel’s foundry business . The company ultimately announced plans to , although the funds Intel accepted from the US CHIPS Act of any such spinoff. The Theory One of the leading theories pertaining to Gelsinger’s ouster is that Intel’s board may have wanted to pursue a more aggressive spinoff than the CEO wanted—especially when considering how focused he was on returning Intel to its former manufacturing glory. Recent comments by Holthaus and Zinser seem to confirm this theory. “Pragmatically, do I think it makes sense that they’re completely separated and there’s no tie?” Holthaus said of Intel’s product and manufacturing divisions, . “I don’t think so. But someone will decide that.” “That’s going to happen,” Zinsner said, speaking of the ongoing separation of the foundry’s business and process operations. “Does it ever fully separate? That’s an open question for another day.” Intel Has a Problem Extending Beyond the Top Job The more details emerge from Intel post-Gelsinger, the more it becomes apparent the company has issues that extend beyond who holds the top spot at the company. The company’s board of directors has had a shocking lack of experience in the semiconductor industry, at least until just recently. The company appointed Eric Meurice, former CEO of ASML Holding, and Steve Sanghi, interim CEO of Microchip Technology to the board in early December. The lack of experience in the semiconductor industry among the company’s board is a critical weak point that likely played a significant role in where Intel is today. That lack of experience likely contributed to poor decisions that saw the company squander its manufacturing and technological lead and may have been a factor in the board growing tired of quarterly losses as Gelsinger rebuilt the company’s manufacturing. While it’s true that Intel suffered some of the worst quarterly losses in its history, rebuilding a company’s manufacturing process is an expensive endeavor, but an endeavor Intel must see through if it wants to regain its former glory. The stakes are especially high now, with the incoming Trump administration promising steep tariffs on foreign imports. Intel is uniquely positioned to once again become the leading semiconductor manufacturer, both for its own chips and for those of its competitors, giving companies an American-owned option for their manufacturing needs. Unfortunately, it seems unlikely the current board of directors has the fortitude to see the company through the expensive, difficult return to its roots, prioritizing short-term profit over long-term gain. Intel Needs a Steve Jobs Steve Jobs’ return to Apple is legendary, an account that will be taught in business school for decades to come. Like Intel, Apple had all the ingredients necessary to be a computing powerhouse, but it needed a strong leader who could help the company return to its roots. Apple, much like Intel, increasingly appears to have an exceptionally ineffective board that has directly contributed to the company’s current situation. In fact, the only redeeming decisions the board helped make were bringing Jobs back, giving him the role of interim CEO, and agreeing to his terms—and that’s where it gets interesting. One of Jobs’ terms for taking on the role was the authority to remove board members and restaff the board with individuals who would be a force for good within Apple, which he set about doing. The rest is history, with Apple under Jobs going on to achieve levels of greatness previously unimaginable. A leader like Steve Jobs is exactly what Intel needs: a leader who isn’t afraid to shake things up, including cleaning out the board of directors and restaffing it with individuals who understand the industry and can be a force for good. Until that happens, Intel’s fortunes will continue to go from bad to worse, and any CEO the company hires will be as hamstrung as Gelsinger was.Joe Douglas is gone. Robert Saleh already was fired. Aaron Rodgers could be next to leave the New York Jets. Douglas lost his job as the general manager on Tuesday, six weeks after the head coach was replaced following a 2-3 start. The Jets have gone 1-5 under interim coach Jeff Ulbrich so owner Woody Johnson sent Douglas packing. Rodgers has played more like a 40-year-old quarterback coming off an Achilles tendon injury than a four-time NFL MVP. He's expressed a desire to play another season. The big question is whether the Jets will want him back. Maybe they'll decide to take one more shot at a playoff run with Rodgers while having him mentor a rookie quarterback. Or, they could start fresh. There are significant contract ramifications either way. Rodgers is slated to make a non-guaranteed $37.5 million in 2025 with a dead cap hit of $49 million as his salary cap total goes from $17.1 million to $23.5 million. The Jets could spread the dead money over two years by releasing Rodgers with the use of post-June 1 designation. He has a no-trade clause in his contract so they would need his permission to make a deal. If Rodgers doesn't retire and New York's new regime wants a clean slate, here are potential destinations for the future first-ballot Hall of Famer: SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS: This could only happen if Brock Purdy's shoulder injury is more significant than is known. Rodgers is a native of northern California and grew up a Niners fan. Returning home to help San Francisco win its sixth Super Bowl has to be attractive. Playing for coach Kyle Shanahan surrounded by playmakers Christian McCaffrey, Deebo Samuel and George Kittle would be a quarterback's dream. Again, Purdy is the team's present and future. And, he's resilient. Purdy rebounded from elbow surgery following his rookie season to start Week 1 last year and ended up finishing fourth in MVP voting, leading the 49ers to the Super Bowl. Purdy also is due for a contract extension and a major raise so the salary cap makes this even more of a longshot. But never say never in the NFL. MINNESOTA VIKINGS: Sam Darnold has been more than a stopgap, helping the Vikings (8-2) to an impressive start. J.J. McCarthy is the future, however, and Darnold will be a free agent after the season. If the Vikings fall short of a Super Bowl and Rodgers shows over the final six weeks that he can play championship football, this could be a fit. The Vikings could let McCarthy sit and learn for another year, especially coming off a knee injury that required a second surgery earlier this month. NEW YORK GIANTS: Rodgers wouldn't have to move. The Giants will need a quarterback after benching Daniel Jones and eventually releasing him. They could draft a quarterback in the first round and have him learn behind Rodgers for a season. That'll depend on which pick New York ends up with because it's a thin draft class. Unlike the Jets, the Giants (2-8) haven't made any coaching or GM changes yet. If it's status quo with GM Joe Schoen and coach Brian Daboll, one year with Rodgers isn't unrealistic. LAS VEGAS RAIDERS: They also need a quarterback. Brock Bowers could set an NFL record for most catches by a tight end if he had Rodgers next season. The Raiders (2-8) are aiming for a high pick to get a shot at a quarterback of their choice. New minority owner Tom Brady believes rookie quarterbacks need time to develop and learn. The seven-time Super Bowl champion would have to be in favor of having Rodgers start and tutor a youngster. TENNESSEE TITANS: If Will Levis doesn't prove over the final seven games that he can be a No. 1 quarterback, the Titans (2-8) will be in the QB market and likely have a high draft pick. It's another scenario where Rodgers would fit as a one-year bridge. Get local news delivered to your inbox!

Andrej Jakimovski hit a layup with 8 seconds left, and Colorado upset No. 2 UConn 73-72 in the consolation bracket of the Maui Invitational on Tuesday in Lahaina, Hawaii. Colorado (5-1) rallied from down 11 in the first half to get the win over the two-time defending national champions Huskies. Jakimovski finished with 12 points and 10 rebounds and Julian Hammond III and Elijah Malone each scored 16 for the Buffaloes, who advanced to the fifth-place game in Maui on Wednesday. Down 72-71, Jakimovski drove the right side of the lane and made a scoop shot as he was falling down. UConn called timeout to set up the final play but Hassan Diarra missed a 3-pointer with 2 seconds left. Liam McNeeley led UConn with 20 points, Solo Ball scored 16 and Diarra finished with 11. The Huskies (4-2) lost two straight for the first time since dropping three in a row from Jan. 11-18, 2023. Colorado trailed by eight at halftime and Diarra hit two 3-pointers early in the second half that made it 46-37. The Buffaloes scored the next 11 points to take a 48-46 lead, their first of the game. Hammond bookended that run with a pair of triples. UConn went back in front 55-52 on Tarris Reed Jr.'s driving layup but Malone's bucket with 8:34 left tied it at 59. McNeeley's hook shot gave the Huskies a 63-60 lead before Jakimovski drained a 3-pointer to tie it again with 5:16 left. Ball hit a 3-pointer and a layup to give UConn a five-point lead but Colorado got within 70-69 on two free throws by Malone with 2:04 left. A putback from Jaylin Stewart made it a three-point game with 1:29 remaining. Malone answered with a layup, Javon Ruffin blocked Diarra's shot and Colorado got an offensive rebound with 24 seconds left to set up the winning basket. McNeeley made his first four shots from deep and had 16 points by intermission to lead the Huskies. Colorado had opportunities to make it a close game by halftime but went just 12-for-19 from the foul line and trailed 40-32. UConn attempted only four free throws in the first half and had five players with two or more fouls, including Reed, who had three. --Field Level MediaRoblox's chief people & systems officer sells $705,259 in stockCHATTANOOGA, Tenn. (AP) — Rafael Pinzon had 22 points in Bryant's 97-85 win over Tennessee State on Tuesday night. Pinzon shot 6 of 15 from the field, including 4 for 5 from 3-point range, and went 6 for 6 from the line for the Bulldogs (4-3). Connor Withers scored 17 points while going 6 of 14 from the floor, including 4 for 9 from 3-point range, and 1 for 4 from the line. Keyshawn Mitchell finished 7 of 10 from the field to finish with 16 points, while adding 13 rebounds. Brandon Weston led the way for the Tigers (3-5) with 24 points and six steals. Antoine Lorick III added 16 points, seven rebounds and two steals for Tennessee State. Carlous Williams had 16 points and two steals. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .

Analysis: If Jets don't want Rodgers, others will

None

Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah agree to a ceasefire to end nearly 14 months of fightingNone

Merrimack holds Fordham to 31 yards offense in 19-3 win

A neuroscientist has claimed that there is a ‘possibility’ to revive the dead through better medicine or in a digital/ robotic form. In his new book, The Future Loves You: How and Why We Should Abolish Death, scientist Ariel Zeleznikow-Johnston sets out the case for changing the way that death is viewed by society and what we can do about it. In discussing overpopulation concerns, Dr Zeleznikow-Johnston pointed out that it was a concern ‘about 200-years ago when there were only 100 million on the planet.’ Speaking on Newstalk’s Moncrieff, Dr Zeleznikow-Johnstown projected that we would come to a day where bodies could be reserved and a person could be revived ‘back into their original body.’ The key would be ‘better medicine,’ with the neuroscientist saying more advanced versions of medicines set to rejuvenate people could exist. Alternatively, he predicted the possibility of giving a person new life in a digital or robotic form. ‘If that’s feasible — which neuroscientists think is definitely a distinct possibility — then you would get around those problems of frailty,’ he told the radio show. Dr Zeleznikow-Johnston refuted over-population concerns. ‘We should take these concerns seriously but there are typically ways to overcomeng these issues without having to have far fewer people exist,’ he explained. The researcher, who is currently affiliated to Monash University in Australia , said he went into more detail about these concerns in his book The Future Loves You: How and Why We Should Abolish Death. Dr Zeleznikow-Johnston was sure the technology created to help revive the dead people would be ‘extremely’ popular. Most people say they’d like to say they’d like to live longer than they’re currently like to get,’ he said, challenging: ‘Survey people in Ireland or Britain, for example, and they’ll say about 90 — so, about 1 years longer than they’re likely to get.’

Related hot word search:

Previous: lobby roblox
Next: offline roulette game