nicehck jialai
2025-01-10   

nicehck jialai

"Once upon a time, in the Land of the Free, there lived a wizard called Kash the Distinguished Discoverer," reads the opening line of The Plot Against The King . It's the first in a trilogy of children's books written by President-elect Donald Trump's pick to lead the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Kash Patel . In the books, Kash the wizard helps a noble hero named "King Donald" foil characters like "Hillary Queenton"' and "Comma-la-la-la." The first book features a thinly veiled reference to the agency Trump has tapped Patel to head as "slug stables in a shadowy corner of the castle," run by "Keeper Komey" referring to former FBI director James Comey, whom Trump fired during his first term in 2017. Another book references 2000 Mules , the thoroughly debunked film that falsely asserts the 2020 election was stolen from Trump. The children's books are just one example of how Patel has parlayed his time serving in various national security roles in the first Trump administration to building a brand promoting pro-Trump conspiracy theories and selling merchandise. Those conspiracy theories have also been cited by Patel in past public statements promising payback for Trump's perceived enemies. Patel started his career as a public defender in Florida and later became a federal prosecutor. His work as a congressional aide helping Republicans defend Trump during investigations into Russian election interference in 2016 got him noticed. As a staffer for Rep. Devin Nunes, (R-Calif.), he helped author a 2018 memo that alleged the FBI and Justice Department committed surveillance abuses by omitting information in its warrant applications to monitor a Trump campaign staffer. An FBI internal watchdog report later confirmed errors and omissions on the applications, but found no evidence that the federal agencies acted with political bias. Patel went on to roles at the National Security Council and Pentagon in Trump's first administration. Alex Pfeiffer, a spokesperson for the Trump transition team, told NPR that experience is why Patel's "beyond qualified" to be FBI director. Patel did not return a request for comment. Christopher Wray, the current FBI director, was appointed by Trump in 2017 and still has more than two years left in his 10-year term. On a Sunday appearance on NBC's Meet the Press , Trump was asked if he intended to fire Wray to make room for Patel. "Well, I mean, it would sort of seem pretty obvious that if Kash gets in, he's going to be taking somebody's place, right?" Trump said. "Somebody is the man that you're talking about." A focus on conspiratorial views In addition to writing children's books, Patel has spent the four years since Trump left office on projects closely aligned with his former boss and the MAGA movement. He was a board member and consultant for the parent company of Truth Social, Trump's social media platform. He launched the Kash Foundation, which he has said assists defamation victims and the families of Trump supporters who have been charged for their role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. He also featured the voices of jailed Jan. 6 defendants in a song he helped produce that Trump played at his rallies. Patel described the song as an effort to raise "funds and awareness for the due process that has been hijacked for so many people who were in and around Jan. 6," while critics called it a part of an effort to reframe the deadly insurrection attempt . (Patel has also pushed the baseless theory that Jan. 6 was primarily instigated by the FBI and its informants to hurt the MAGA movement). Patel also became a fixture on right-wing talk shows and podcasts. His scores of appearances include shows hosted by far-right fringe figures such as Stew Peters , who is known for spreading conspiracy theories and hate speech , as well as calling for the death penalty for Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden's son, and Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a co-host of a talk show for The Epoch Times, a media company known for spreading baseless conspiracy theories, a review by NBC found Patel shared unfounded claims about supposed conspiracies aimed at undermining Trump perpetrated by government officials, the FBI, social media platforms, the media and others. Patel has used his exposure to sell merchandise. He sells K$H-branded wine (some of the proceeds go to charity) and supplements that he claims 'detoxify' the supposed negative effects of COVID vaccines. His foundation sells branded clothes, accessories, playing cards and his books. Patel's book for adults, Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy , is framed as an insider's tell-all about his experiences during the first Trump administration. He uses the term "government gangsters" to refer to career bureaucrats who he claims are part of a corrupt "deep state." Patel described these "government gangsters" – as well as "people on the radical left and the mainstream media" – as "pure evil" in an interview earlier this year with a conservative Christian YouTuber . The idea of the deep state, which was popularized by Trump and embraced by his supporters, is one of Patel's main talking points, said Russell Muirhead, a political science professor at Dartmouth College who has co-authored books about modern conspiracy theories and democracy. "The deep state conspiracy refers to the idea that a huge, huge raft of governmental officials — many in the executive branch answering to the president — are actually hostile to the president and want to defeat him, want to obstruct him, want to disempower his constituents and his movement," Muirhead said. He said whether someone believes in it or not, the deep state idea functions to legitimize a project of disabling or disrupting parts of government that don't bend to Trump's will. Courting QAnon believers The deep state is also a key feature of many modern, pro-Trump conspiracy theories, including QAnon . Adherents of QAnon claim the deep state works with a cabal of pedophile elites to secretly traffic children and harvest a chemical from their blood . They believe a government insider known as Q is working with Trump on a plan to take down the cabal and left cryptic clues on online message boards. One of those supposed clues, known as a "Q drop," mentioned Patel by name in 2018 with the note, " name to remember " – making him a celebrated figure in QAnon lore. QAnon believers have long been anticipating what they call "the storm," which they expect will include mass arrests and punishment for "the cabal" and members of the deep state. Trump's decision to pick Patel to lead the FBI has been celebrated by the movement's key influencers as a sign " the storm " is imminent. For his part, Patel has been willing to court QAnon believers as he built his brand and platform in recent years. In 2022, after Patel inscribed some copies of one of his children's books with a QAnon slogan, he fielded questions about whether he was a believer. He claimed he used the slogan because of its ties to a movie , but did not distance himself completely, either. "You know, the Q thing is a movement. A lot of people attached themselves to it," Patel told pro-Trump influencer Mary Grace at the time . "I disagree with a lot of what that movement says, but I agree with what a lot of that movement says." Patel has tended not to focus on the pedophile part of the belief system, but he's made more than 50 appearances on at least a dozen podcasts that have either promoted the QAnon movement or shared QAnon-related conspiracy theories. Patel made overtures to QAnon influencers to join Truth Social and helped promote an account called "Q" on that platform. In an appearance on the X22 Report , a podcast and video show known for promoting QAnon, Patel told the host that his "championing cause" was "to get our people and mainstream America listening to your show rather than CNN, reading ... The New York Times and The Washington Post ." When asked about Patel's comments about QAnon and appearances on related podcasts, Trump transition team spokesperson Pfeiffer told NPR, "This is a pathetic attempt at guilt by association." It is not unusual for those in Trump's orbit to wink at the QAnon movement. Trump and Elon Musk, the owner of the social media platform X, who was one of Trump's biggest financial supporters this election cycle, have both shared content related to QAnon in recent months. Muirhead, the Dartmouth professor, noted that Patel seems willing to "embrace the whole train of conspiratorial assertions associated with or even that define Donald Trump." And that includes QAnon. "It delivers him to an audience of sympathetic listeners and watchers," Muirhead said. Concerns about retribution Past comments Patel made promising retribution against Trump's perceived enemies, including for what he falsely alleges was a stolen election in 2020, have resurfaced since Trump announced he wants Patel to lead the country's top law enforcement agency. Patel's threats have also led to concerns that he will try to use the agency to harass personal and ideological foes in a modern version of the practices of the FBI's founding director, J. Edgar Hoover. "We will go out and find the conspirators, not just in government, but in the media," Patel said last year on former Trump adviser Steve Bannon's talk show, War Room . "Yes, we're going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections — we're going to come after you. Whether it's criminally or civilly, we'll figure that out." Patel has previously sued journalists for defamation. After a former Trump official argued on MSNBC last week that Patel is unfit to lead the FBI, she received a letter from his attorney demanding she retract certain statements she made about Patel's record or face litigation. When asked about these past threats, Pfeiffer, the Trump spokesperson, told NPR, "Kash Patel is going to deliver on President Trump's mandate to restore integrity to the FBI and end the weaponization of the agency." On the campaign trail leading up to the November election, Trump repeated vows to get revenge and prosecute perceived foes. On his Sunday appearance on Meet the Press Trump denied that he would direct Patel to launch investigations against his perceived political enemies but said Patel is "going to do what he thinks is right." When pressed about whether he wanted such investigations to happen, Trump said, "If they were crooked, if they did something wrong, if they have broken the law, probably. They went after me. You know, they went after me and I did nothing wrong." At another point in the interview, he mentioned the members of the congressional committee that investigated his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and said "Honestly, they should go to jail." Charles Kupperman, a former deputy national security adviser to Trump, told NPR he did not trust Patel when he overlapped with him at the National Security Council and said he believes appointing Patel to lead the FBI would be a mistake. The FBI has traditionally been independent from the president, but Kupperman has concerns that could change. "Kash will be a propagandist for Donald Trump," said Kupperman, who said he did not vote for either candidate in the last election and wrote in a name instead. "He will carry out any orders that the White House president gives him, and he will have an opportunity in the organization if he is confirmed at the FBI to invoke retribution against individuals. And it will not be a pretty picture or good for the country." Kupperman said he worries Patel will focus on rooting out government employees who are perceived as being disloyal to the president. He recalled a 2019 meeting where Trump had proposed Patel do that at the National Security Council, but Kupperman and others pushed back. Now he worries such an agenda could be part of Patel's mission if he were to head the FBI. "It will be a waste of effort and it will take our eye off of the ball of the other problems," Kupperman said. Patel's book, Government Gangsters, includes an appendix of names of people he considers part of the deep state. Kupperman's name appears on the list, though he said that won't stop him from speaking out about how he thinks Patel is an inappropriate choice for the job. "The fact that this individual is making the list, that is another example of why he's not fit to be the FBI director," Kupperman said, adding that he is not impressed with how Patel has chosen to spend the last four years. "Writing pseudo-children's books about the king and so forth doesn't strike me as a strong resume for an individual to become FBI director." For Muirhead, the prospect of having a conspiracist content creator heading an investigative agency raises another alarming possibility. "The FBI could be used to support, to generate, conspiratorial narratives that delegitimate the opposition and empower the regime," Muirhead said.

Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s pick for intel chief, faces questions on Capitol Hill amid Syria fallout

Music sector workers to lose near a quarter of all work over next four years, says study

The Kremlin fired a new intermediate-range ballistic missile at Ukraine on Thursday in response to Kyiv's use this week of American and British missiles capable of striking deeper into Russia, President Vladimir Putin said. In a televised address to the country, the Russian president warned that U.S. air defense systems would be powerless to stop the new missile, which he said flies at ten times the speed of sound and which he called the Oreshnik — Russian for hazelnut tree. He also said it could be used to attack any Ukrainian ally whose missiles are used to attack Russia. “We believe that we have the right to use our weapons against military facilities of the countries that allow to use their weapons against our facilities,” Putin said in his first comments since President Joe Biden gave Ukraine the green light this month to use U.S. ATACMS missiles to strike at limited targets inside Russia. Pentagon deputy press secretary Sabrina Singh confirmed that Russia’s missile was a new, experimental type of intermediate range missile based on it’s RS-26 Rubezh intercontinental ballistic missile. “This was new type of lethal capability that was deployed on the battlefield, so that was certainly of concern," Singh said, noting that the missile could carry either conventional or nuclear warheads. The U.S. was notified ahead of the launch through nuclear risk reduction channels, she said. The attack on the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro came in response to Kyiv's use of longer-range U.S. and British missiles in strikes Tuesday and Wednesday on southern Russia, Putin said. Those strikes caused a fire at an ammunition depot in Russia's Bryansk region and killed and wounded some security services personnel in the Kursk region, he said. “In the event of an escalation of aggressive actions, we will respond decisively and in kind,” the Russian president said, adding that Western leaders who are hatching plans to use their forces against Moscow should “seriously think about this.” Putin said the Oreshnik fired Thursday struck a well-known missile factory in Dnipro. He also said Russia would issue advance warnings if it launches more strikes with the Oreshnik against Ukraine to allow civilians to evacuate to safety — something Moscow hasn’t done before previous aerial attacks. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov initially said Russia hadn’t warned the U.S. about the coming launch of the new missile, noting that it wasn't obligated to do so. But he later changed tack and said Moscow did issue a warning 30 minutes before the launch. Putin's announcement came hours after Ukraine claimed that Russia had used an intercontinental ballistic missile in the Dnipro attack, which wounded two people and damaged an industrial facility and rehabilitation center for people with disabilities, according to local officials. But American officials said an initial U.S. assessment indicated the strike was carried out with an intermediate-range ballistic missile. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a Telegram post that the use of the missile was an "obvious and serious escalation in the scale and brutality of this war, a cynical violation of the UN Charter.” He also said there had been “no strong global reaction” to the use of the missile, which he said could threaten other countries. “Putin is very sensitive to this. He is testing you, dear partners,” Zelenskyy wrote. “If there is no tough response to Russia’s actions, it means they see that such actions are possible.” The attack comes during a week of escalating tensions , as the U.S. eased restrictions on Ukraine's use of American-made longer-range missiles inside Russia and Putin lowered the threshold for launching nuclear weapons. The Ukrainian air force said in a statement that the Dnipro attack was launched from Russia’s Astrakhan region, on the Caspian Sea. “Today, our crazy neighbor once again showed what he really is,” Zelenskyy said hours before Putin's address. “And how afraid he is.” Russia was sending a message by attacking Ukraine with an intermediate-range ballistic missile capable of releasing multiple warheads at extremely high speeds, even if they are less accurate than cruise missiles or short-range ballistic missiles, said Matthew Savill, director of military sciences at the Royal United Services Institute, a London-based think tank. “Why might you use it therefore?” Savill said. "Signaling — signaling to the Ukrainians. We’ve got stuff that outrages you. But really signaling to the West ‘We’re happy to enter into a competition around intermediate range ballistic missiles. P.S.: These could be nuclear tipped. Do you really want to take that risk?’” Military experts say that modern ICBMs and IRBMs are extremely difficult to intercept, although Ukraine has previously claimed to have stopped some other weapons that Russia described as “unstoppable,” including the air-launched Kinzhal hypersonic missile. David Albright, of the Washington-based think tank the Institute for Science and International Security, said he was “skeptical” of Putin’s claim, adding that Russian technology sometimes “falls short.” He suggested Putin was “taunting the West to try to shoot it down ... like a braggart boasting, taunting his enemy.” Earlier this week, the Biden administration authorized Ukraine to use the U.S.-supplied, longer-range missiles to strike deeper inside Russia — a move that drew an angry response from Moscow. Days later, Ukraine fired several of the missiles into Russia, according to the Kremlin. The same day, Putin signed a new doctrine that allows for a potential nuclear response even to a conventional attack on Russia by any nation that is supported by a nuclear power. The doctrine is formulated broadly to avoid a firm commitment to use nuclear weapons. In response, Western countries, including the U.S., said Russia has used irresponsible nuclear rhetoric and behavior throughout the war to intimidate Ukraine and other nations. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Thursday that Russia’s formal lowering of the threshold for nuclear weapons use did not prompt any changes in U.S. doctrine. She pushed back on concerns that the decision to allow Ukraine to use Western missiles to strike deeper inside Russia might escalate the war. ′′They’re the ones who are escalating this,” she said of the Kremlin — in part because of a flood of North Korean troops sent to the region. More than 1,000 days into war , Russia has the upper hand, with its larger army advancing in Donetsk and Ukrainian civilians suffering from relentless drone and missile strikes. Analysts and observers say the loosening of restrictions on Ukraine's use of Western missiles is unlikely to change the the course of the war, but it puts the Russian army in a more vulnerable position and could complicate the logistics that are crucial in warfare. Putin has also warned that the move would mean that Russia and NATO are at war. “It is an important move and it pulls against, undermines the narrative that Putin had been trying to establish that it was fine for Russia to rain down Iranian drones and North Korean missiles on Ukraine but a reckless escalation for Ukraine to use Western-supplied weapons at legitimate targets in Russia,” said Peter Ricketts, a former U.K. national security adviser who now sits in the House of Lords. ___ Associated Press writers Jill Lawless and Emma Burrows in London, and Zeke Miller and Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report. ___ Follow AP’s coverage of the war in Ukraine at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine

Now You Can Watch HBO on Max the Way God IntendedRyan Adams named interim dean of UND College of Engineering and Mines

Top 5 Must-Read Books from Sierra Leone: A Journey Through History, Culture, and Stories

HSFTOOLS Expands the Thermal Imaging Market with a Focus on Practical ApplicationsWith third location in Turners Falls, Community Health Center to serve another 4,000 patients

Related hot word search:

Previous: nicehck c8-1
Next: niceme