https www ye7 fun
2025-01-13   

Steam Turbine Market: Current Trends, Future Growth, and Key Insightshttps www ye7 fun 。

Wisconsin kayaker who faked his death and fled to Eastern Europe is in custody, online records showInitial reaction from U’s boss after tepid defeat at QPR

AN astonishing “new aristocracy” of couples, relatives and nepo-babies runs the Government. More than two dozen ministers including Rachel Reeves , Pat McFadden and Wes Streeting all have spouses or relatives on the taxpayer or Labour Party payroll, analysis shows. Sir Keir Starmer’s Government is littered with husband and wife ­politicians, sisters in top roles and the offspring of Labour powerbrokers. Seven members of the Cabinet, including the Defence and Business Secretary, are related to either another minister, a Labour-appointed ­special adviser or a civil servant. The Government finally published their first set of transparency returns yesterday outlining any potential conflicts of interest around the Cabinet table and across Whitehall. And it showed an unprecedented 28 ministers are related to each other, married to other Labour politicians or have their partner also on the public purse. READ MORE ON LABOUR Under Rishi Sunak’s Tories, that figure was 11. Chancellor Ms Reeves’ husband is a powerful Whitehall mandarin, while Cabinet Office boss Pat McFadden’s wife was appointed by Sir Keir as a political aide. Ms Reeves’ MP sister Ellie now attends Cabinet, while Ellie’s ­husband John Cryer is a Labour minister in the House of Lords. Health Secretary Mr Streeting’s partner is paid by Labour as a spin doctor, while minister Georgia Gould’s husband is an adviser to Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall. Most read in The Sun Ms Gould is considered Labour royalty, as her father Philip was the architect of New Labour and her mother serves as a Labour peer. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander’s husband is a senior figure at media regulator Ofcom. The lower ranks are also heaving with ministers whose partners and family also serve Labour or the taxpayer. Foreign Office minister ­Hamish Falconer’s father is a ­Labour peer, while fellow minister Baroness Chapman’s husband Nick Smith is a Labour MP. The Eagle sisters, Angela and Maria, serve Home Office and Defence Ministers respectively. Meanwhile, Treasury Minister Lord Livermore’s partner Seb Dance is London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s deputy. Fellow peer Baroness Smith, who serves as Advocate General of Scotland, is the youngest daughter of the former Labour leader John Smith and her mother is also a Labour peer. And Baroness Blake, who is a whip in the House of Lords, has a daughter, Olivia, who was elected as a Labour MP in July. Housing minister Alex Norris’s wife Emma Foody was elected for Labour in July. And fellow newbie MP Imogen Walker — the Chancellor’s Commons aide — is married to Sir Keir’s Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney. He ousted former Chief of Staff Sue Gray, whose son Liam Conlon was elected to Parliament this year as a Labour member. Last night Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Alex Burghart said: “Here’s Labour’s new aristocracy laid bare — it’s all who you know or are related to.” A Labour insider said: “People tend to get into Labour politics quite young, and then spend their time hanging out with their ­Labour comrades so often that it makes sense to marry one. “For others, the parental or spouse connections can help them get a foot in the door or a leap up the ladder.” Read More on The US Sun A Downing Street spokesman said: “To rebuild Britain and deliver the change our country needs will require talent, expertise and creativity. We won’t hesitate to make sure the right people are around the table.” THE new ministerial register of interests also revealed Energy Minister Kerry McCarthy has donated to Greenpeace — whose controversial tactics have included scaling the roof of Mr Sunak’s family home last year. By Harry Cole CAN you imagine the howls of fury from Labour if those evil Tories had hired their mothers, brothers, lovers and come-all-ye-others into plum roles in the Government? It’s remarkable just how much of Sir Keir Starmer’s frontbench seems to be related to, married to, or descended from another Labour figure of note. And it’s fascinating how many Labour households are getting a double-dipping from the public purse as a result. They insist that it’s the best man or woman that has got the job but does that really pass the sniff test? Can they really say that every single member of this so-called “new aristocracy” got where they are on merit alone?It was during the first months of the pandemic that human figures first began appearing in Russell Leng’s usually abstract paintings. Since then, the TWU Art + Design faculty member transitioned from abstraction to figuration art, and he is now displaying these latest works in an exhibit at the university leading up to Christmas. Leng said "Thru u," his exhibition of new paintings that opened on Wednesday, Nov. 20, invites viewers to contemplate "our interconnectedness." In 2020, his work shifted towards figuration and the intricate web of relationships that hold us together. Admittedly, this is a highly personal body of work represents a new direction for Leng. As people gazes at his new paintings, figures emerge from the highly textural surfaces – a hand, a head, a boot, a figure within a figure. These indistinct and abstract figures surface and dissolve, intertwine and merge speaking to society's fundamental interconnectedness, said the sessional assistant professor, who joined TWU in 2015 – the same year he was shortlisted for the RBC Painting Prize. Leng explains that these paintings “explore where we begin and end in relation to one another” and invite the viewer to contemplate “the significance of the many subtle connections we share.” Less representations of actual bodies and more symbolic messenger figures, Leng hopes his abstracted bodies gesture to a more gentle and supportive way of being together. "Amidst the tensions of global conflict, domestic politics and rising inequality," Leng’s wants the figures to offer a vision of "interconnection and interdependence that is a balm to our contemporary sense of alienation." Gallery coordinator Alysha Creighton has been a fan of Leng's work for some time, and anxious to display his lastest creations. “I’ve been watching this body of work develop for several years," she said. "I’m so excited to be able to present this soulful and visually rich body of work at the SAMC Gallery.” Leng’s exhibition, named for one of his first new pieces "Thru u," is on view at the School of the Arts, Media + Culture (SAMC) Gallery on Trinity Western University’s Langley campus until Dec. 21. The exhibition and events are free and open to the public from Mondays to Thursdays 7:45 a.m. to 11 p.m., Fridays 7:45 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturdays 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., and Sundays 1:30 to 5 p.m. There is also a Gallery coffee break being held on Tuesday, Dec. 3, from 10:30 to 11 a.m.

Rudy Giuliani draws rebuke for a courtroom outburst accusing judge in assets case of being unfairRudy Giuliani draws rebuke for a courtroom outburst accusing judge in assets case of being unfair

Chiefs Star Chris Jones Hit With Fine After Loss To Bills

LINCOLN — In a conference known for offensive lines and running the ball, Nebraska’s defense is set to face its biggest challenge to date in Iowa’s Kaleb Johnson for Friday’s regular season finale at Kinnick Stadium. The Huskers ( 6-5, 3-5 Big Ten) have been stout against the run all season, not allowing a single rushing touchdown at home and only 110 rushing yards per game. But this challenge will be on the road, under the lights, in a rivalry game against the second-leading rusher in all of college football. “When you go back and watch the film, they are good at what they do,” Nebraska defensive coordinator Tony White said of the Hawkeyes. “Offensive line is excellent at blocking and sifting through all that stuff. (Johnson) is as elite as they come in terms of breaking tackles, great vision and can put a foot in the ground and plant any which way. It’s going to be a great challenge. That is what the Big Ten is about and we've got to tackle well, play with dominant contact and get a lot of bodies around the ball.” Johnson only trails Boise State’s Ashton Jeanty this season in rushing yards with 1,492 and 21 touchdowns. The junior has rushed for over 100 yards in four straight games and has scored in all 11 Iowa games to this point, while averaging nearly seven yards per carry. “He breaks tackles,” White said of Johnson. “He doesn’t go down just by lowering the shoulder. His center of gravity is low, and it doesn’t look like he is running very hard, but you cannot tackle. He is an elite back, and it is going to be a challenge to the guys to make sure they wrap up, run their feet and get bodies in pursuit around him.” But Friday night will be strength against strength with the Huskers’ defensive front coming to town. The Huskers, though having allowed over 100 yards rushing in three straight games, have been dominant in the trenches for most of the season, allowing under 80 rushing yards in five of their 11 games. Having one more shot against the best of the Big Ten has been a challenge, White said, the group has welcomed during this week’s practices. “The stuff (Terrance) Knighton is having them key on and all of those things, it’s been a good week of preparation so far. Embracing the process gives you a chance to go out there and play well,” White said. “Right now, it's just looking schematically at some things and then getting them emotionally ready to play the game. They will be geeked up to play, especially the old guys.” Holgorsen discusses switch at TE position In the second week of changes under new offensive coordinator Dana Holgorsen, the most notable adjustment seen was at Nebraska’s tight end position, which saw more snaps for its backups than usual starter Thomas Fidone. Fidone logged a season-low three snaps after being pulled following a false start just 10 seconds into the game. The majority of those snaps went to Luke Lindenmeyer and Nate Boerkircher, in an effort, Holgorsen said, to “promote competition." “I took that approach at every position,” Holgorsen said. “I know everyone wants to talk about the tight end position because of what happened on Saturday, but that has been the case at every position. It’s about competition, which makes people better.” Lindenmeyer caught one pass for eight yards in Saturday’s win against Wisconsin, while Boerkircher added two catches for a season-high 29 yards. Part of the reason for the duo’s increase in snaps has been their noticeable improvement in the offensive system over the past two weeks “I don't care who has played,” Holgorsen said. “If you are not performing at the level I need you to, based on what is done in practice, then we are going to change it. That position has been changed based on the fact that Nate and Luke have really done a nice job.” But that doesn’t mean Fidone’s benching is permanent. Holgorsen said Fidone has responded well to the change, and is expected to be involved in Friday’s game plan at Iowa. “I think that really motivated Thomas,” Holgorsen said. “He just had his best practice he has had since I have been here. I appreciate his attitude and understanding. He lined up and practiced hard for two days, so I would anticipate him lining up, going in there and making plays on Friday.” Raiola hoping for another rivalry win Friday’s game in Iowa City will be a battle of experience and inexperience. Nebraska’s offense will be led by a coordinator who has been on the job for two weeks and a quarterback who has been under center for four months. Their assignment? Beat an Iowa defensive system that has been in place since defensive coordinator Phil Parker has been on staff beginning in 1999. “Their head coach and coordinator have been together since I was even born,” Nebraska quarterback Dylan Raiola said. “Obviously a lot of experience and they play very sound and well together. With it being the last game, you could see them getting better and progressing each week. We will have to be ready for anything they have for us.” It was clear, following Saturday’s blowout win over the Badgers, that Nebraska’s offense is beginning to hit its stride, too, as the group gets more comfortable with Holgorsen calling plays. “Just building that relationship and understanding what he wants to call and when he wants to call it,” Raiola said. “Everyone on the offense got more comfortable and you see that as we kept progressing throughout the game.” Nebraska’s 44 points against Wisconsin were the most in two seasons under head coach Matt Rhule. Its 473 total yards of offense were the most since this year’s season opener against UTEP and its 180 rushing yards was its second-highest this season. An afternoon like that, Raiola said, only builds excitement to do it again the next game. “It’s even better when you watch the tape and see things that you can do better,” Raiola said. “We are excited. Just back at square one to get ready for the next opponent and put that one behind us.” “Serious rivalry,” Raiola said. “It will be electric Friday night. Last game at their place.”The Fortnite gods are smiling down upon us, as players can now permanently add some classic characters to their collection for absolutely nothing. Forget nabbing Chord Kahele or Mr. Dappermint for free because several Fortnite favorites have found a new place in our lockers. Epic Games has been gifting gamers plenty in the run-up to Christmas, with a growing sack of presents that includes the popular Fortnite OG , the first-person Fortnite Ballistic , and the upcoming LEGO Fortnite Brick Life . And now, although some have been asking for it since launch, Epic Games has finally added the ability to choose your default skin before jumping into a game. It comes alongside the release of Fortnite OG, which gives players a healthy dose of nostalgia by showing off how the shooter used to look (with a few graphical upgrades). Fortnite finally lets players always choose default Jonesy Over on Reddit, fans joked about how selecting your default skin is basically like Fortnite giving out a free Jonesy. Despite starting out as any other ‘Recruit’, Jonesy has since become a core part of the Fortnite mythos and is arguably the game’s most important original creation. While chances are many players already have an array of different Jones skins , the default selection option is effectively Jonesy The First without having to buy him separately or purchase the Battle Classics Bundle. One Reddit user wrote, “It actually annoys me when I was little, randomizing defaults skins that I don’t like, thank goodness they added this.” They weren’t alone in their praise, with others flocking to the comments to thank Epic for finally letting them pick a default character. Related: As well as someone simply calling it a ‘W’, another cheered, “Oooooh. Yeah I did always think it was weird that it was randomized. Don’t run it much but nice to have the option!” Someone else couldn’t wait to try on their default threads and said, “Gonna run default Jonesy for a few games just [because] I can now.” Although these skins have become associated with bots or tryhards who like to troll by lulling newer players into a false sense of security, the likes of Jonesy have continued to grow in popularity. He might be the MVP of the Recruits, but now, Banshee and Renegade supporters can wear their skins with pride too. Expect to see lobbies filled with default Jonesy, which makes a change from the trend of every game being littered with Slayer Juice WRLD skins after Epic gave them away for free.Dave Portnoy weighs in on Michigan vs. Ohio State brawl as cops use pepper spray

Every other Tuesday, the team behind Civics 101 joins NHPR’s All Things Considered host Julia Furukawa to talk about how our democratic institutions actually work. Republicans have won enough seats to have a narrow majority in the U.S. House. When President-elect Donald Trump is sworn in next January, the Republican Party will be in control of the presidency and Congress. This week, Civics 101 senior producer Christina Phillips joined Julia to talk about what happens when one party has both the executive and legislative branches of government. Transcript Christina, when's the last time one party had control of both the executive and legislative branches? I mean, how common is this? So this is known as unified control. The most recent time this happened was actually pretty recently. It was during Biden's first two years in office. And Republicans also had unified control during Trump's first two years. But I should say this is not super common these days or when it happens, it doesn't last very long. Prior to the 1960s, unified control was the norm. Why doesn't it last that long? I think it's a factor of the increased partisanship that we're seeing over the last couple of decades, [or] more than a couple of decades. But really, what happens now is that if one party is in control of both Congress and the White House, you often see in the midterm elections that that president and that party will lose power going forward. When there was unified control in previous administrations, what kind of laws were they able to pass? So unified control makes it easier to pass major lasting legislation. I think one of the most famous examples is Obamacare, which [is] the Affordable Care Act, [and] it passed in 2010 when Democrats had unified control. Trump and Republicans had the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and then Biden had the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. But it is worth pointing out, like I said, that in today's politics, unified control is pretty hard to keep. In all of those examples, the party with unified control lost that control during the next midterm election. It's easier to point to one party as a whole for your dissatisfaction in the government, when it seems like that party has all of the power. And other than passing legislation, what else does this unified control make it easier to do? It certainly makes it easier for a president to carry out other aspects of their agenda, for example, political appointments. That's not just members of the president's cabinet, [it] also includes judges on lower courts, which could have a lasting impact on how laws are interpreted in a way that could affect you and me. So is unified control necessarily better or worse than having a divided government? In terms of the function of democracy, in that we elect people and then hold them accountable for the job we've chosen them to do, a unified government is ideal because it means that the chosen leaders carry out the policies they were elected on with more efficiency. However, a divided government provides a greater check on power between the two branches, whether it be congressional investigations or the threat of a veto. Voters can provide their own check at the voting booth, of course, but that happens every two years and a lot can happen in the meantime.

Related hot word search:

Previous: 3 yen to php
Next: ye7 bet sign up bonus